Having thoroughly covered the history and current day space warfare domain, with Sheldon we turn to the future. With no established patterns or outlines, what would happen if offensive action was taken, and how quickly might things escalate? With so much debris up there and the number of debris continuing to increase, what are the real possibilities for cleaning it up? Do we have the technology to do so, and how much would it cost?įinally we look at the lack of rules of engagement in space warfare. This includes lasers, anti-satellite weapons kinetic weapons, space guns, and dropping things from space onto earth. We look at types of space weapons and why there has been such limited testing of these capacities. With China's recent test of their anti-satellite missiles which is estimated to have created up to 25% of the space debris in orbit, we look at the specifics of how satellite operations may be offensively impacted and the consequences of anti-satellite missiles. Muraviev takes us into the nitty gritty of how critical satellites and space systems are for a variety of modern military applications, comparing across missile types, guidance systems, and ground force operations. We look at the consequences of multiple GPS systems being developed to rival the United States' - The EU's Galileo, China's BeiDou, and Russia's GLONASS. From guidance to navigation to early warning to interception, a good deal of modern military innovations are reliant on space support and space technology. Muraviev helps us understand just how critical space capacity has become to the day-to-day operations of military forces since then. Sputnik's launch in 1957 marked the changeover from space exploration to space militarisation. What does it say about US policy and the progress made by its rivals? And what consequences does it have for the structure of the US military and its acquisition process?įinally we look at space tech, including lasers to move satellites or remove them from orbit, the problems with weapons deployment in space, and the ability to interfere with satellites' intelligence gathering. We look at the 20 year history of attempts to create a space force, and what its creation means for the future militarisation of space. ![]() Space Force is the United States' first new military service since 1947. Additionally, the EU is deploying their own GPS system called Galileo, and has limited military development. We overview the key actors, from Russia who fell behind near the end of the Cold War and has only improved its capacity in some theatres, to China who has rapidly secured its second place in number of space assets deployed, but is only in its first generation. We look at what militarising space provides, from improving precision bombing, strengthening communications, enabling manual and autonomous drone navigation, and improving a variety of intelligence applications including national intelligence, nuclear proliferation monitoring and timely tactical information during warfare.Įvery country is working to catch up to the successes and capabilities that the United States has built for itself in space. Bowen takes us through space's history as a theatre of warfare, from the two horse race beginning at the start of the cold war, to the open theatre of competition we find ourselves in today. The militarisation of space is as old as the space age itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |